Why not arm British citizens to help stop terrorists?

British citizens are brave but disarmed. This man fought with the terrorists in the recent attacks even though he was unarmed.

Think what he could have done if he’d been carrying a handgun!

Unfortunately, the British government does not support arming its citizens. Quite the opposite.

In the United Kingdom, access by the general public to firearms is tightly controlled by law which is much more restrictive than the minimum rules required by the European Firearms Directive.

But public opinion in Great Briton may be changing.



2 Comments on "Why not arm British citizens to help stop terrorists?"

  1. andy tschetter | June 8, 2017 at 8:07 am | Reply

    Well, it’s obvious that British citizens do not have a constitutional right to life.

  2. Devout Canadian | June 24, 2017 at 11:58 pm | Reply

    It is imperative for ALL civilians in Canada, UK, New Zealand, Australia and USA get armed. These countries are in league and will be confiscating all firearms very soon. Not possible if EVERYONE is armed.
    Think Five Eyes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

    More than a billion rounds of hollow point….
    For what?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.